3:03 pm PHT

It’s been a very long time since I last saw a science-fiction film and I can’t even remember offhand the last one I did see. So it was a breath of fresh air that I managed to catch the screening of Sunshine a few weeks ago. Essentially, the movie is about the journey of spaceship Icarus II and its crew of eight to the sun to revive it by igniting a massive stellar bomb. While the film is primarily science fiction (which some have compared to Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey), there are large elements of drama and action incorporated into the movie. I pretty much liked the movie.  :)

First, the premise of the movie is quite impossible—the sun dying 50 years into the future, leaving the earth into a terminal ice age—but it’s quite easy to dismiss it since we are drawn immediately into the story. As I said the movie is part drama, because we are witness to the psychological effects to the crew of isolation from earth for months. An unsolved mystery was that seven years prior, Icarus was sent on the same mission but failed in their mission and was never heard from again. Icarus II was therefore sent.

On the approach to Mercury, Icarus II heard the distress beacon of Icarus and they decided to rendezvous with it to get a second bomb, in case the one they’re carrying was not enough or did not work. Almost immediately, things unravel and begin to jeopardize their mission. (Maybe they shouldn’t have named their ships Icarus.)

The movie’s multinational cast consisted of primarily lesser known actors and actresses, with only the names of Chris Evans and Michelle Yeoh jumping at me. This effectively leads the viewer to avoid being figuratively starstruck and instead be literally starstruck with the sun and to be more engaged with the plot. I found the acting quite superb.

What I liked most about the film is it’s really excellent visuals. While the cinematography is nowhere near as beautiful as 300, it’s very much pretty in it’s own way and the mood and sense of alienation is enhanced by low-key ambient music. The scene where Mercury transits in front of the blazing sun is especially notable.

On the other hand, the last third of the movie, which is essentially a mini suspense/thriller, detracted quite a bit from the overall appeal of the movie. Then again, without that element, the movie would’ve been boring as hell, and we would not have learned why Icarus failed in their mission. I just wish that the blockbuster-ish-ness was toned down a bit. (Digression: I haven’t seen this mentioned elsewhere before now, but the film subtly plays out the religion vs. science debate card: if the sun is dying, is it God’s will and should we stop it?)

The film very much reminds me most of Solaris, the science much more believable than either Armageddon or The Core. Overall, I’d recommend that you see this film at least once, since it’s unlike any film you might have seen within the past several months. While it’s no longer screening here in the Philippines, moviegoers in the United States can catch it during the latter half of this year.  :)

Filed under

Add your comment | 4 comments


Comment times are in Philippine time (+0800).


On 4:19 a.m., 7 May 2007, benj wrote:

I watched it with my debate org and we all hated it.  :( I find it amusing that I’ve read total slams and “I LOVE IT” raves from blogs.

The movie had no focus and was absolutely devoid of believable acting. The title sucked and I feel very embarrassed to see so many Asians “star” in such a crappy excuse for a movie. hehe.

Naming a spacecraft designed to “save the sun” as Icarus is the dumbest thing ever.

I want my money baaaaack!  :(


On 9:01 p.m., 9 May 2007, drei wrote:

eugene, eto nakita kong trivia:

“The plot does not revolve around the sun dying in the normal sense: this is not due for around five billion years based on our understanding of nuclear fusion. It has instead been “infected” with a “Q-ball”—a supersymmetric nucleus, left over from the big bang—that is disrupting the normal matter. This is a theoretical particle that scientists at CERN are currently trying to confirm, and was one of the many contributions of the science advisor. The film’s bomb is meant to blast the Q-ball to its constituent parts which will then naturally decay, allowing the sun to return to normal.”

i loved the movie!!


On 1:17 p.m., 12 May 2007, Rico wrote:

Haven’t seen this yet, but I really wish they had a better title. And I was really waiting for that actor from Fantastic Four to scream “Flame On!”  :)


On 3:17 p.m., 12 May 2007, seav wrote:

Benj and Drei, it goes to show that Sunshine is a love-hate thing. You either love it or you hate it. I fall into the former camp, but I won’t say that the film is really exceptional.

Rico, well, Sunshine is better title than The Sun (alluding to The Core), wouldn’t you agree? And regarding the F4 connection, maybe Chris Evans (The Torch) should have flown into the sun and gone supernova, right? He almost did it in Fantastic Four anyway. Hehehe.  :)

Post your comment here

Comments moderated: Comments for this entry is now moderated. That means that the author will have to approve the comment before it can be viewed by the public.

Remember The Data Above? (Uses Cookies)

Comment shown to:

Comment notes

Your name and e-mail address are required. Your e-mail won't be displayed.